Turley on Rosenstein Report: 'Optics Would Be Perfectly Horrible' If Trump Responds With 'Mass Firing'
In the wake of a New York Times report Friday alleging Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein made statements about secretly recording President Trump and invoking the 25th Amendment, law Professor Jonathan Turley said it likely put a strain on an already tough White House relationship.
Rosenstein denied the report.
The vice president and a majority of cabinet members would have the power to collectively direct Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) to remove Trump under the 1967 amendment.
— Fox News (@FoxNews) September 21, 2018
Turley, of George Washington University, said on "Your World" that there is already a lack of a working relationship between Rosenstein and Trump, and that the president is also on icy terms with Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
He said there is also other reports Rosenstein did say such things while meeting with then-Deputy FBI Director Andy McCabe and FBI attorney Lisa Page, but that he was "joking."
"Joking about recording the president or having him forcibly removed [from office] does not help their relationship either," he said.
Noting the upcoming midterm elections, Turley said that if Trump were to respond to the report by conducting a mass firing of DOJ officials, "the optics would be perfectly horrible for the White House."